SCOTUS Appeal By Former President Expected
A federal appeals court has determined that former President Donald
Trump is eligible to be tried on charges linked to his attempts to contest the 2020 election outcome, dismissing his claims of immunity. This pivotal decision opens the door for potential further legal challenges, possibly escalating to the U.S. Supreme Court, and casts doubt on when the trial might proceed. The unanimous verdict from the court underlined that no individual, including ex-presidents, is exempt from the law, countering Trump’s assertion of absolute authority. This ruling is consistent with prior dismissals of Trump’s immunity defenses, underlining the significant political ramifications of when the trial is set to occur. As Trump seeks a return to the presidency, he is concurrently facing various legal battles, including accusations of holding classified documents unlawfully, efforts to undermine Georgia’s election results, and involvement in hush money payments.
The court stated, “We cannot uphold former President Trump’s claim that a President possesses limitless power to engage in criminal activities that would invalidate the essential check of executive power—the acknowledgment and execution of election outcomes. Nor can we endorse his implied belief that the Executive has complete freedom to infringe upon the voting rights of citizens and the counting of those votes.”
This ruling advances the case towards a jury trial and comes before the Supreme Court’s review of whether Trump’s conduct related to January 6 disqualifies him from holding presidential office under the Constitution’s insurrection clause. Trump intends to challenge the immunity ruling at the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. Despite facing legal challenges, Trump’s strategy includes attempting to postpone any trial until after the next presidential election, where he is a leading candidate for the Republican nomination. This decision disputes Trump’s argument that former presidents are shielded from prosecution for actions tied to their official duties without impeachment and conviction first. Legal scholars and appellate judges have critiqued Trump’s position, pointing out the contradiction in claiming immunity while participating in activities that may breach criminal statutes. The ongoing case poses critical questions about the limits of presidential responsibility and the extent of immunity for actions conducted in office.
Sources:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/06/trump-jan-6-immunity-appeal-denied/
“New Wave” acolyte, heard a song on LA alternative station KROQ that discussed a man whose life was ruined by his beauty. Everyone only liked him for his looks, which left him shallow. The song concludes with the subject being involved in a terrible accident, disfiguring his face and thus providing him with a life of bliss.
search may give results including Budget Rental Car in Nashville, or the metal band Budgie, who formed in the late 60s, but very little about this new band itself. Budge’s lack of even a basic press kit makes it kind of hard to write about them, but the energy presented in their one single, 
small clubs in Los Angeles, New York, and London.